Archive - Websites RSS Feed

Don’t mess with conventions

There are conventions to website design.

Conventions are set ways of doing things. They aren’t laws or rules, but rather guidelines that have evolved over time to make the user experience easier, regardless of which website they are visiting. For example, a common convention on a website is to place the search box in the top-right corner. It’s not a legal requirement, but web users are used to finding it there, so this has developed as a convention – common practice. Another convention is to place legal information (e.g. the disclaimer or copyright details) in the footer.

Steve Krug in his awesome book “Don’t make me think” explains that conventions aren’t unique to website design. Take for example, reading a newspaper:

“…a phrase in very large type is usually a headline that summarizes the story underneath it, and that text underneath a picture is either a caption that tells me what it’s a picture of, or – if it’s in very small type – a photo credit that tells me who took the picture” (page 34).

Conventions are your friends.

But they aren’t always followed, and this can be confusing. Take for example my recent visit to the Matthias Media website. On the homepage is a form to sign-up for their monthly enewsletter. This is a great service to offer to website visitors. But it’s confusing – take a look:

Screenshot_MatthiasMediaEnewsSignup

When I first glanced at this form, I began to write a post questioning the need for so much information from the visitor, simply to sign-up for the e-newsletter. Over-asking is a major gripe of mine! I assumed they were over-asking because of the use of the asterisk (*) above several of the fields. In website design, an asterisk is a convention used to indicate required information.

Yet at the bottom of the form is an explanation – the * in this instance, indicates that the field is optional. It’s good to have this explanation, but to avoid confusion it would be much easier to stick to conventions and just use the * to indicate the information that’s required (i.e. the email address).

I also tried to sign-up for more information about AngliConnect. To be honest, I wasn’t exactly sure what AngliConnect was, but it had been recommended as a service I should check-out, so I paid it a visit last week. Below is the sign-up form I needed to complete:

Screenshot_AngliconnectSignup

However, none of the fields are indicated as ‘required’ (i.e. no * or other explanation). So in terms of web conventions, I shouldn’t need to add any information to any of the fields. Yet, when I submitted the form without my mobile number, an error message appeared, explaining that I needed to include this. Not only wasn’t I told that the mobile number was necessary, I couldn’t understand why I would need to provide two phone numbers. Of course, when you are creating a form it’s your prerogative to request whatever information you like. Just be aware that the more you ask, and the more complex and less conventional the process, the more frustrating this is for the user, and the greater potential for the user to just walk (or click) away.

My intention isn’t to single out Matthias Media or AngliConnect. All of our church and ministry websites are a work in process. My intention is to affirm that conventions are our friends. Learn them (by visiting other websites or reading great books like ‘Don’t make me think’) but, unlike our friends, use them. It will make the experience of visitors to your site easier, and less confusing.

Village Church anticipates newcomer questions

I stumbled across the Village Church website on the weekend whilst trying to see if Matt Chandler has preached on Genesis. He hasn’t, but the visit wasn’t unfruitful. I was encouraged by the way the Village Church has thought through some of the questions visitors to their church might have, and addressed them on their website.

Two sections stood out to me – check out these screenshots below:

VisitingTheVillage

And:

VillageChurchHomepage

Lots of our church websites could learn from the Village Church. These links aren’t revolutionary – they simply show a willingness to consider the needs of potential newcomers, and making it as easy as possible for people to make their way into church. I’ve seen a lot of church websites, and I’ve never seen a link to ‘what was your first impression’. This links to a page where visitors can share if they felt welcomed and invited in. Great idea.

Have you seen other examples of newcomer-focussed web content and design?

On a related note

Matt Chandler is speaking at the Engage conference in August. If you live in Australia (and realistically, close to Katoomba), get along. Thanks to the internet, I’ve been encouraged by quite a few of Matt’s talks and I’m looking forward to hearing him live this year. You can get some practice in by checking out the Village Church’s sermon library.

Clean up bad website wording

I’ve been reviewing a couple of hundred websites in an effort to find the best and worst church websites in Sydney (Anglican churches only at this stage!). I won’t be naming the worst, but I’ll be sharing some of the mistakes they make, along with suggestions for how to fix these problems. The fix is often very easy, once you are aware of the problem.

Here’s what I mean.

I’ve noticed that the words and language we use on our websites can also be unhelpful or confusing for visitors. Here are three examples:

1. An explanation on a church website of “why do we meet?”

“We feel that it is important we (Christians) to come together to learn more about Jesus.”

Do you feel it’s important, or does the Bible say it’s important?

2. A welcome message

“We long to welcome you”.

This language sounds desperate (and perhaps a little creepy).

3. On a church homepage

“At X Anglican you will:

Get to know God better…Meet new friends and get to know your neighbours…
Trust your children to the care of our children’s workers”

My response when reading that is “Will I trust my children to your care?! That seems very presumptuous!”

My point here is very simple – read the content on your church website. Consider it from the viewpoint of someone who isn’t familiar with your church. And edit out any ambiguity or confusion.

Get a free church website

Tony Morgan and Collision Media have just launched a competition.

“Submit your ugly church website below, and tell us about your church. On April 7th we’ll announce the winner with the ugliest website and most compelling story, and Collision Media will begin the design of a custom website valued at US$1499.”

I’ve been visiting a lot of church websites recently – many of them are worthy contenders for this prize!

Check out the Battle Ugly Church Websites Giveaway for more information and to enter your church!

Can people contact you? Five lessons for church websites

There are two things that are absolutely essential to have clear and blazingly obvious on your church’s website:

  1. Details of service time/s and location/s
  2. Details of how to contact contact you

The first one is a no-brainer. If you want people to come to church, make sure you tell them when and where to come. However, you’d be surprised to see how often websites (and not just churches) make it difficult for people to contact them. Take a look at your own website, and consider it from the perspective of someone who has never visited your website – how easy is it to find contact details?

I’ve been checking out resources for churches who want to develop or re-develop their website and I’ve had a couple of very strange ‘contact’ experiences recently, that illustrate what not to do.

Firstly, on the contact page of one website was the following message:

bad-contact-1

Interesting.

Then as I started to complete the form with details of my query, this popped up:

bad-contact-2

Everything on this site was geared towards existing clients. Hopefully they have enough existing clients, because at the rate they’re going, they won’t be getting any new ones.

Secondly, the contact form for another website was ridiculously complex, and didn’t cater for my query which had nothing to do with the information they wanted to extract from me. They thought I had a question about building a specific website. I didn’t – I had a journalistic question about building websites in general.

Instead, I was forced to complete a lengthy form, where nearly all the fields were ‘required’, where I had to make up most of my responses because they wanted me to answer questions that just weren’t relevant to me.

Here is just half of the form I had to complete:

lengthy-contact-form

If my preference for contact is email, why does it matter what day and time of day you contact me? Why does it matter how many full-time and part-time staff work at the church? This hasn’t been thought through very well.

So, here are three fives for church websites when it comes to contact information:

  1. Make it very obvious on the homepage (and every other page, e.g. in the footer) how people can contact you.
  2. Don’t require that people provide information that isn’t necessary, or that they might not feel comfortable providing.
  3. Provide actual names of people they can call or email. Your church is a body of people, not an automated machine – don’t give the impression their email will just disappear into a bureaucratic black hole.
  4. Provide multiple contact opportunities. Don’t just give a phone number or email address. Provide people with both options – let them choose what’s most appropriate for them, rather than what suits you best.
  5. Finally, view your website from the perspective of a newcomer. Does the contact information (and everything else on your site) give an impression that you are glad that they are visiting, and that you welcome their communication with you? Or does it look like a club for members, and that you’d prefer they didn’t bother you?
Page 7 of 7« First...«34567